tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8484469243105805372.post5926717318313002599..comments2024-03-23T03:28:28.294-07:00Comments on Double Refraction: Historians of science have too many big pictures, not too fewMichael Bycrofthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11357752389960585219noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8484469243105805372.post-62189336128028910782022-09-22T19:23:39.064-07:002022-09-22T19:23:39.064-07:00I can't think of any of Shapin's work that...I can't think of any of Shapin's work that hasn't been thoroughly debunked as ahistoricalAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8484469243105805372.post-54405383132091251272022-08-05T13:28:06.378-07:002022-08-05T13:28:06.378-07:00Nice bblog you haveNice bblog you haveUniversity Plumbershttps://www.professional-plumber.com/us/plumbing-service-florida/university-plumbers.shtmlnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8484469243105805372.post-46793447943896973352017-12-13T03:41:27.206-08:002017-12-13T03:41:27.206-08:00Thanks for sharing this fascinating and informativ...Thanks for sharing this fascinating and informative blog about the historic aspect of Science itself. Share more of such interesting postings please. So looking forward to view’em!Kerry Schultzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03458167672052324164noreply@blogger.com