Looking twice at the history of science

Sunday, October 28, 2012

Jonathan Rée on the vanity of historicism

Jonathan Rée
I should have known that it would be a tall order to get married and maintain a bilingual blog over the same summer. But I'm pleased to say that after a few months of inactivity posting will now resume on this blog. I regret to add that it will no longer be bilingual. The reasons for this are the obvious one that translation is time-consuming, and the less-obvious one that the bilingualism so far practiced on this blog has already done its job of improving my French. At least a bit.


I have some things to say on the much-discussed topic of Whiggism, but as a warm-up here are some remarks on an intriguing paper from two decades ago: Jonathan Rée, "The Vanity of Historicism," New Literary History, 1991, 22(4), 961-983 (paywall).

The paper is intriguing for three reasons. Firstly, it presents an outsider's perspective of the history of science--Rée was a professor in philosophy when he wrote the article, and is now better known as a freelance writer and historian. Secondly, Rée endorses a thesis that is part of Will's picture, namely that recent historians of science tend to suffer delusions of novelty. Thirdly, Rée gives a general and plausible explanation of why those delusions exist. I'll say what Rée's views are and then say what I think of them, in general and with respect to the discipline of the history of science. Expand post.

1 comment:

  1. Tips om hier een goedkoop nike air max schoenen exemplaar te kopen. Replica horloge Nederland Mensen zoeken veel op internet naar schoenen, dus het is gemakkelijk om een goede deal te kopen. nike air max replica Er zijn veel replica's van bekende designermerken te goedkoop air huarache koop en we kunnen er zeker van zijn dat ze van hoge kwaliteit en goed zijn.