Looking twice at the history of science

Saturday, September 12, 2015

Lorraine Daston on history as fiction – critical thoughts

Nick Tosh and Lorraine Daston have, separately, made some intriguing remarks about the affinities between fiction and the history of science. Their remarks follow on nicely from my last post. Daston compares historians to readers of mystery novels who know in advance how the story ends. She means this as a criticism. By contrast, Tosh praises authors who freely acknowledge the gap between themselves and their subjects, a stance that Tosh labels ‘postmodern.’ My position is somewhere in between: it is OK for readers to know how the story ends, but this is not a particularly postmodern phenomenon. Expand post.


  1. Your articles are really top notch and should be made to reach more people. Some times the depth of the concept is so deep that I cannot understand them at all.

  2. the protagonist encounters a school essay writing about his son about heroes, and why he does not believe in them. By clicking on lines with the mouse